Skip to main content

A philosopher trades the market.



I do not have much love for Philosophy, especially of the metaphysical kind. I have found Philosophy to be stating the simplest facts in so many ways that the output is a complex jumble of metaphysical imagination. The end result is spreading the nuggets so thin, the core is lost in the multitude. And as a result the fact ends up becoming an imagination.

Thankfully, market is not that deep. Not as deep as other questions that we try to answer in philosophy. Playing market is a simple game of discipline and hard work. But so obtuse are its interpretations, that tomes have been filled up already and more libraries need to be built in future too. Market has been pushed to the realms of deep-field.

I have been in market for so long that I don't know if there is anything well that I can do better in my life. But comparatively, my 3 month only puppy dog would be a better trader. If I follow him, or better let him manage my account, I will be rich beyond dreams.

Before you take offense and taunt me - I am a technical trader. Fundamentals to me is a deep-field*. I like to keep it simple**.

If I program, say a trending indicator like MACD, to show a chocolate when it is positive and bark once and show a stick when it turns negative and bark twice: he will be richer than me in no time! I am pretty sure this should work. The sad part is no matter how much I bark, I wont be able to beat my boy. Its there in the head! (or too much head)

If the above scenario has remotest chance of succeeding, a big chance I feel, now this begs a question, why then am I philosophical. Why do I need tonnes of data garbage, which my school headmaster summed up in a word - discipline. Which, as the stories go, frail grandfathers thought from their hospital beds.

Why do I have to seek solace in the intellectually challenging business writing. When I may be better off not reading any or better know nothing other than buy-on-chocolate and sell-on-stick.

I don't have an answer. But possible it is because of the notion that making money is the toughest job. We are brought up with the notion you cant find diamonds on the rough. So, perhaps we are conditioned to believe, even the market has to be tough, making money is tough, being rich is tough. Greed and fear make the parameters difficult to predict. Perhaps simply, my cross-checking (risk management, in other words) is a defensive mechanism.

Can market be so complicated. Universe cant be so complicated. Our DNAs carry more information but may be few bytes long. Our organs are made with simplest configuration. A simple rule defines gravity, tides, solar system***. Why then the crowd behavior has to have so complex an analysis. In one of the Feynman talks (posted earlier), he says there is an initial expansion of complexity and then an integration in to simplicity.

Prophecy is a futile exercise. Even trying prediction with out understanding probabilities is frivolous exertion. Following of the simplest of rules, nothing different than purest business sense, should do the trick.

Business sense may not do the trick in the intra-day, though from a perspective it is very much needed too. I feel so, therefore I depend on technicals. Technical analysis can paralyze in no time. The vision is lost in the squiggles. Common sense gets whipsawed among moving averages.

Simplicity may do the trick. If it can do for systems of the world, then it may work for me too. If only I can forget!!!

:) Falkor

* For example, I have never understood what a PE has to do with intra-day. Or what Debt-Equity has to do with my being short or long.
** With handful of track able (in relevant timescale) parameters
*** Please feel free to correct me
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cognitive rules of business presentations

In his recent book, Clear and to the Point, Kosslyn explained that the four rules of PowerPoint are: The Goldilocks Rule, The Rudolph Rule, The Rule of Four, and the Birds of a Feather Rule. Here's how they work. The Goldilocks Rule refers to presenting the "just right" amount of data. Never include more information than your audience needs in a visual image. As an example, Kosslyn showed two graphs of real estate prices over time. One included ten different numbers, one for each year. The other included two numbers: a peak price, and the current price. For the purposes of a presentation about today's prices relative to peak price, those numbers were the only ones necessary. The Rudolph Rule refers to simple ways you can make information stand out and guide your audience to important details -- the way Rudolph the reindeer's red nose stood out from the other reindeers' and led them. If you're presenting a piece of relevant data in a list, why not mak...
Post a Comment
Read more

Value of dollar - Part 1

A Simple Perspective Will Do The date is 2000-05-28. Don't you get tired of all the bad news bears reminding you of all these instabilities, excesses, and 'potential' tensions in the global economy? After all, hasn't it always been like that? Yes it has, but not in money it hasn't. Increasingly, investors find it harder to know where to put their savings. What about Government Bonds? Wrong. Their recent record of capital losses have wiped out your guaranteed yields, probably because the stock market keeps crowding them out, and this even in a strong dollar and low inflation environment. Furthermore, there is no reliable liquidity and potentially poor quality debt in the corporate sector. Foreign assets? Wrong. Most of the world's economies are riskier, have been under performing, and also, there is this thing called currency risk. Like how is the average person gonna cope with currency...
Post a Comment
Read more

Depreciation of British Pound 1900-2000

When the Bank of England was formed the powers to create money was finally transferred to private hands. The creation of Fed in US, was just a part of this cycle. Though it is a common knowledge US Dollar has depreciated nearly 100% since the creation of Federal Reserve, the same is the case of all the currencies across the globe. For example, below is the UK Parliament data that highlights the depreciating value of Pound.
2 comments
Read more