Skip to main content

Crude @ 200 - Imagining is possible :(

RIYADH (Thomson Financial) - Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez warned on Saturday that oil prices -- currently camped out just below the 100 usd a barrel mark -- could hit 200 usd if the United States attacked Iran or Venezuela.

His comments came in an opening speech at the Third OPEC Summit.
"If the United States was mad enough to attack Iran or aggress Venezuela again the price of a barrel of oil could reach 150 usd or even 200 usd," Chavez said, describing 100 usd as a "just" and "fair" price.

He also suggested the 12-member oil cartel should "ask the most powerful nation in the world to stop threatening OPEC", referring to the United States.
"The basis of all aggression is oil. It is the underlying reason," he said, referring to the war in Iraq and US threats against Iran.

"(The OPEC states) need stability, we need to know the world powers do not expect us to guarantee regular supply and stability of prices without anything in return."

"Today OPEC stands strong. It is stronger than it has ever been in the past," he said. "OPEC should set itself up as an active geopolitical agent."

Speaking shortly after Chavez, Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah said oil should not be allowed to become a tool of war. "Oil is an energy for construction and must not become an instrument for conflict," King Abdullah said, noting that OPEC had always been a fair organisation.

"If we were to factor in fluctuation and inflation it would not have reached its actual price of the 1980s," King Abdullah said.

Meanwhile, Chavez said: "OPEC must change and become a much stronger player in the geopolitical and geo-economic domains.

"In the years ahead OPEC should set itself up as an active political agent."
Chavez also said Venezuela is proposing the setting up of an OPEC bank, so the cartel can have a bigger say in the financial markets and help redistribute wealth to the underprivileged.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cognitive rules of business presentations

In his recent book, Clear and to the Point, Kosslyn explained that the four rules of PowerPoint are: The Goldilocks Rule, The Rudolph Rule, The Rule of Four, and the Birds of a Feather Rule. Here's how they work. The Goldilocks Rule refers to presenting the "just right" amount of data. Never include more information than your audience needs in a visual image. As an example, Kosslyn showed two graphs of real estate prices over time. One included ten different numbers, one for each year. The other included two numbers: a peak price, and the current price. For the purposes of a presentation about today's prices relative to peak price, those numbers were the only ones necessary. The Rudolph Rule refers to simple ways you can make information stand out and guide your audience to important details -- the way Rudolph the reindeer's red nose stood out from the other reindeers' and led them. If you're presenting a piece of relevant data in a list, why not mak...

Monetary inflation, Spiritual devaluation

Its been sometime I have been trying to make some special people understand the evils of inflation. Inflation is an abstract subject most of us dont know about, let alone understand the technicalities amidst jargons. I have in my previous post have briefly touched the social part of inflation but never in a concentrated way. I understand what my friends mean when they say "tell me in layman’s language." It is not a heartening sign, that they avoid technicalities. But it could well be that knowing where they stand, their role and understanding the social changes in the light of inflation may motivate them to understand the term "inflation." This is just to highlight the brief points. First and the foremost, is there any link between inflation numbers and society. Yes. The relation is same as the relation between society and money. What is money? Money is an easy means of exchange. If I am selling my horses to a pig-farmer and I am not interested in taking pigs in ret...

Unprecedented External Demand Shock Underway

India’s export growth averaged 24.8% over the last three years, driven by strong global growth. However, over the last three months, export growth has decelerated sharply. While until recently the strong demand from emerging markets including Latin America, Emerging Europe, the Middle East and Africa ensured that export growth remained healthy, over the last three months disruptions in the macro environment of these economies have been evident. Apart from weakening demand, exports have also been affected by the lack of availability of foreign trade credit and inventory liquidation. India’s exports declined by 12.1%Y in October 2008 compared with 10.4% in September and 26.9% in August. While we expect some improvement in the second half of 2009, exports are likely to be unusually weak over the next six months. We now expect exports to decline by 5.3%Y in 2009 compared with 12.7% in 2008 (estimated) and 23.1% in 2007 Excerpt source