Skip to main content

Liquidity and Systematic risk

Peter Bernstein in his article published in Journal of Portfolio Management speculates on the relationship between the liquidity and systematic risk.

The article seems to be based on the assumption that the liquidity is very closely correlated to systematic risk. This can be proved empirically and something traders experience day-to-day. Briefly, liquidity is the function of various macro-economic factors and hence would lead to a systemic impact.

Mr. Bernstien says, "How much research do you need to buy S&P500 index fund or futures as compared with research you would have to do if you wanted to pick and choose just a few among those five hundred stocks? No wonder the five hundred together are more liquid than any one or even ten of them - and in this case diversification comes along for the ride. No research!"

"More liquid the asset, more the liquidity means WYSIWYG. The value of all assets with so much similarity move up and down together because they are interchangable with one another." and hence "When it comes to most liquid kinds of assets such as money or treasury bills, liquidity and sytematic risk are one and the same. [emphasis in original]

In other words, if the liquidity is more, the impact the market forces has on the particular asset is more, and if the liquidity is less the systemic impact is less. Using the above, we can deduce, liquidity & specific-risk are two sides of the same coin (are inversely related). Hence as the degree of liquidity reduces for a particular asset the specific-risks for the asset increases, and hence the need for greater amount of asset specific research.

We may also deduce that (relative) out-performance [;)] is directly related to the liquidity in the asset.

On a lighter vein, in the periods of liquidity would be the period of easy money for those who are in right asset class. We do not require fund managers to outperform. We only have to watch the liquidity (policies/impact) in the system. Or as the street wisdom goes, high-tide raises all boats. But make sure you factor in the specific-risk so that you are not the one swimming naked when the tide goes out.


>> To be revised

:) Falkor

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cognitive rules of business presentations

In his recent book, Clear and to the Point, Kosslyn explained that the four rules of PowerPoint are: The Goldilocks Rule, The Rudolph Rule, The Rule of Four, and the Birds of a Feather Rule. Here's how they work. The Goldilocks Rule refers to presenting the "just right" amount of data. Never include more information than your audience needs in a visual image. As an example, Kosslyn showed two graphs of real estate prices over time. One included ten different numbers, one for each year. The other included two numbers: a peak price, and the current price. For the purposes of a presentation about today's prices relative to peak price, those numbers were the only ones necessary. The Rudolph Rule refers to simple ways you can make information stand out and guide your audience to important details -- the way Rudolph the reindeer's red nose stood out from the other reindeers' and led them. If you're presenting a piece of relevant data in a list, why not mak...

Monetary inflation, Spiritual devaluation

Its been sometime I have been trying to make some special people understand the evils of inflation. Inflation is an abstract subject most of us dont know about, let alone understand the technicalities amidst jargons. I have in my previous post have briefly touched the social part of inflation but never in a concentrated way. I understand what my friends mean when they say "tell me in layman’s language." It is not a heartening sign, that they avoid technicalities. But it could well be that knowing where they stand, their role and understanding the social changes in the light of inflation may motivate them to understand the term "inflation." This is just to highlight the brief points. First and the foremost, is there any link between inflation numbers and society. Yes. The relation is same as the relation between society and money. What is money? Money is an easy means of exchange. If I am selling my horses to a pig-farmer and I am not interested in taking pigs in ret...

Unprecedented External Demand Shock Underway

India’s export growth averaged 24.8% over the last three years, driven by strong global growth. However, over the last three months, export growth has decelerated sharply. While until recently the strong demand from emerging markets including Latin America, Emerging Europe, the Middle East and Africa ensured that export growth remained healthy, over the last three months disruptions in the macro environment of these economies have been evident. Apart from weakening demand, exports have also been affected by the lack of availability of foreign trade credit and inventory liquidation. India’s exports declined by 12.1%Y in October 2008 compared with 10.4% in September and 26.9% in August. While we expect some improvement in the second half of 2009, exports are likely to be unusually weak over the next six months. We now expect exports to decline by 5.3%Y in 2009 compared with 12.7% in 2008 (estimated) and 23.1% in 2007 Excerpt source