Skip to main content

Taken for ride on freaky derivative deals

I remember a conversation with a friend who was a Head of Derivative Sales at a major bank. He told me how laws were circumvented to reach targets of everybody: sales targets for the sales team and revenue targets for corporates. Effectively, corporates played their shareholders' money to speculate so that they could assure bonus. And this was sometime back, so there were not much disaster-stories to share.

Derivatives can be pretty freaky - freaky when it gives you great returns and freaky when it makes a big hole in the pocket. Indian firms, who were unleashed on international markets after liberalization are learning the lessons the hard way. Good times are over, well atleast in short term. Actually derivatives have burnt the fingers of almost everybody (sub-prime) in 2007. But this is the first time Indian firms are loosing heavily in their foreign exchange exposures. A fascinating snippet from Bloomberg:

-------
Sundaram, which has no business in Switzerland, paid nothing on Oct. 24 when it bought a contract betting on the Swiss franc's value against the dollar. On that day, the franc traded for 1.17 to the dollar, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

The contract guaranteed Sundaram $36,000 as long as the franc was valued at more than 1.23 to the dollar within a month, according to the company's lawsuit. If the Swiss currency appreciated past 1.095, a record high, in three months, Sundaram would have to buy $6 million at 1.23 francs to the dollar.

The franc rose to 1.08 on Nov. 20 as concerns about a U.S. recession lured traders to the Swiss currency. A second contract with a $22,000 potential profit also turned into a loser, forcing Sundaram to buy an additional $7.5 million at 1.23.

ICICI demanded 60 million rupees, more than Sundaram's annual profit, to cover the losses.
--------

Yet again proves how ignorant people are taken for a ride by smooth talking jargon spouting sales people.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cognitive rules of business presentations

In his recent book, Clear and to the Point, Kosslyn explained that the four rules of PowerPoint are: The Goldilocks Rule, The Rudolph Rule, The Rule of Four, and the Birds of a Feather Rule. Here's how they work. The Goldilocks Rule refers to presenting the "just right" amount of data. Never include more information than your audience needs in a visual image. As an example, Kosslyn showed two graphs of real estate prices over time. One included ten different numbers, one for each year. The other included two numbers: a peak price, and the current price. For the purposes of a presentation about today's prices relative to peak price, those numbers were the only ones necessary. The Rudolph Rule refers to simple ways you can make information stand out and guide your audience to important details -- the way Rudolph the reindeer's red nose stood out from the other reindeers' and led them. If you're presenting a piece of relevant data in a list, why not mak...

Monetary inflation, Spiritual devaluation

Its been sometime I have been trying to make some special people understand the evils of inflation. Inflation is an abstract subject most of us dont know about, let alone understand the technicalities amidst jargons. I have in my previous post have briefly touched the social part of inflation but never in a concentrated way. I understand what my friends mean when they say "tell me in layman’s language." It is not a heartening sign, that they avoid technicalities. But it could well be that knowing where they stand, their role and understanding the social changes in the light of inflation may motivate them to understand the term "inflation." This is just to highlight the brief points. First and the foremost, is there any link between inflation numbers and society. Yes. The relation is same as the relation between society and money. What is money? Money is an easy means of exchange. If I am selling my horses to a pig-farmer and I am not interested in taking pigs in ret...

Unprecedented External Demand Shock Underway

India’s export growth averaged 24.8% over the last three years, driven by strong global growth. However, over the last three months, export growth has decelerated sharply. While until recently the strong demand from emerging markets including Latin America, Emerging Europe, the Middle East and Africa ensured that export growth remained healthy, over the last three months disruptions in the macro environment of these economies have been evident. Apart from weakening demand, exports have also been affected by the lack of availability of foreign trade credit and inventory liquidation. India’s exports declined by 12.1%Y in October 2008 compared with 10.4% in September and 26.9% in August. While we expect some improvement in the second half of 2009, exports are likely to be unusually weak over the next six months. We now expect exports to decline by 5.3%Y in 2009 compared with 12.7% in 2008 (estimated) and 23.1% in 2007 Excerpt source