Skip to main content

Pareto principle and unfair advantage

It is a very good sentiment to believed world is fair and equally balanced. But unfortunately it is not. There are no 50:50 balances in this world. So, does that mean there is no balance? There is a balance, which I think is a skewed balance. A balance which enables the equilibrium to take place.

One of the universally accepted theories that point to this contradictions Pareto's theory also called as Law of vital few. This law states that 80% of the effects come from 20% of causes. This skews the risk or rewards more on a certain set of population that others. The world is thus unequal. For example, 20% of population lives in luxury, essentially implies that 80% of population does not have access to that luxury. 80% of internet traffic is represented by top 20% of websites and so on.

20% of people make money in market. Some estimates state an even lower number. This implies there are large numbers of people who do not make money in markets.

The point this post tries to make is: if you are part of elite few and you know that, then it essentially means there are 80% of population who are not like you. For example, if you are blogging on financial issue, 80% of blogs are not on financial issues. It is a very crude method but gives you the magnanimity of the tasks that we undertake when we make a major change.

Assuming you are on top of your class, the premium 20%, and you add your value by taking some more courses, you become 20% of the initial 20% in that area. That may or may not give you the advantage you desire but it will definitely set you apart when votes are counted in.

Remember to be in the premium half always. Trying to be so gets you one level inside already.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cognitive rules of business presentations

In his recent book, Clear and to the Point, Kosslyn explained that the four rules of PowerPoint are: The Goldilocks Rule, The Rudolph Rule, The Rule of Four, and the Birds of a Feather Rule. Here's how they work. The Goldilocks Rule refers to presenting the "just right" amount of data. Never include more information than your audience needs in a visual image. As an example, Kosslyn showed two graphs of real estate prices over time. One included ten different numbers, one for each year. The other included two numbers: a peak price, and the current price. For the purposes of a presentation about today's prices relative to peak price, those numbers were the only ones necessary. The Rudolph Rule refers to simple ways you can make information stand out and guide your audience to important details -- the way Rudolph the reindeer's red nose stood out from the other reindeers' and led them. If you're presenting a piece of relevant data in a list, why not mak...

Monetary inflation, Spiritual devaluation

Its been sometime I have been trying to make some special people understand the evils of inflation. Inflation is an abstract subject most of us dont know about, let alone understand the technicalities amidst jargons. I have in my previous post have briefly touched the social part of inflation but never in a concentrated way. I understand what my friends mean when they say "tell me in layman’s language." It is not a heartening sign, that they avoid technicalities. But it could well be that knowing where they stand, their role and understanding the social changes in the light of inflation may motivate them to understand the term "inflation." This is just to highlight the brief points. First and the foremost, is there any link between inflation numbers and society. Yes. The relation is same as the relation between society and money. What is money? Money is an easy means of exchange. If I am selling my horses to a pig-farmer and I am not interested in taking pigs in ret...

Unprecedented External Demand Shock Underway

India’s export growth averaged 24.8% over the last three years, driven by strong global growth. However, over the last three months, export growth has decelerated sharply. While until recently the strong demand from emerging markets including Latin America, Emerging Europe, the Middle East and Africa ensured that export growth remained healthy, over the last three months disruptions in the macro environment of these economies have been evident. Apart from weakening demand, exports have also been affected by the lack of availability of foreign trade credit and inventory liquidation. India’s exports declined by 12.1%Y in October 2008 compared with 10.4% in September and 26.9% in August. While we expect some improvement in the second half of 2009, exports are likely to be unusually weak over the next six months. We now expect exports to decline by 5.3%Y in 2009 compared with 12.7% in 2008 (estimated) and 23.1% in 2007 Excerpt source