While doing some research on alternative energies, I looked up at Wikipedia for some info on solar energy and what I found was shocking.

Wikipedia is a volunteer encyclopedia, so I understand there will be goof ups. I have always been 'Wiki it' 'Google it' person, but if this is the "quality" of free, then we certainly have to evaluate its value.
My recent post wherein I mentioned my Yahoo email being blocked also represents the helplessness in these free-offerings. You do not have any recourse to them. I guess, you read the 'Terms and conditions' or just skipped it?
Feeling a deja vu with lots of 'free' offerings on net of the famous dot.com bubble. Economically, how long can these sites run free? Wasn't that the question that brought down the house of dot.com bubble. Things have not changed much. Ad revenues are not going to keep the sites afloat for long. This is very similar to 'grab the eyeballs' strategy of 2000.
How long will this last?
Wikipedia is a volunteer encyclopedia, so I understand there will be goof ups. I have always been 'Wiki it' 'Google it' person, but if this is the "quality" of free, then we certainly have to evaluate its value.
My recent post wherein I mentioned my Yahoo email being blocked also represents the helplessness in these free-offerings. You do not have any recourse to them. I guess, you read the 'Terms and conditions' or just skipped it?
Feeling a deja vu with lots of 'free' offerings on net of the famous dot.com bubble. Economically, how long can these sites run free? Wasn't that the question that brought down the house of dot.com bubble. Things have not changed much. Ad revenues are not going to keep the sites afloat for long. This is very similar to 'grab the eyeballs' strategy of 2000.
How long will this last?
Comments
Post a Comment