Skip to main content

Hypocrisy of Indian Knowledge Companies

Collapse of Satyam has exposed the double-talk of Indian companies on the threshold of Silicon Valley.



Investors come across people, almost everyday, who do not mean what they preach. They say all the good things that would otherwise go into the textbooks and seminal works but when it comes to reality their actions are completely different.



Indian companies, nay the Indian Silicon Valley companies have over years constantly harangued western and developed countries on the rise and inevitability of knowledge society. World is flat and what not. They have constantly bombarded western media with equally high-sounding concepts that were meant to take away the jobs of US and Europeans and shift them to India. And of course, take a good amount of saving as profits, nay commissions.



Now the question is: were and are Indian companies who have been die-hard propagandists of 'Coming of knowledge society' up to the mark. Or are they short-sighted, just-industrial, and mere hypocrites.



One of the things that Satyam episode has exposed is Indian knowledge companies is just hypocritical salespeople. When it came to act on the attributes of knowledge society, they backed off. They lost the first Round.



We can give them a benefit of doubt for the business and survival strategies but they have not been clear on that or may be shy of stating the reality that they too are teetering on the brink of recessionary measures.



Knowledge society



Knowledge society is made up of individuals and not by companies that they form. Is Satyam made up of one individual named Raju? What about thousands of people working are their contribution any less critical?



Satyam is not made up by Raju; it is made up by people who collectively give Satyam its form. Satyam does not go home when Raju goes home but goes out of the door 55000 times a day.



When Infosys says it does not want to buy a tainted company, one is compelled to ask: true the company is tainted by not its employees. Employees carry their integrity in their hearts and worth in their heads. Closing the doors to these knowledge workers is like closing doors is like keeping out infected organisms.



In the business where talent is the true worth of Knowledge Company, Infosys and many company of its ilk have made a deadly mistake. By taking the stance on moral high ground, against Satyam as a collective, Infosys has really lost the respect of many in the industry. It also stereotypes itself for its own employees, the hollowness of its proclamations - in the knowledge society, a knowledge worker is known by the company he keeps and not by knowledge itself. Weird!



Analysis



In the present scenario no body has the right to claim high throne, unless proven to be. Why should I trust Infosys more than Satyam? There are no reasons. Zilch. Everyone is under microscope. The biggies have to prove them once again and cannot rely on past laurels. Lets us for instance look at Infosys.



  1. Infosys has had a great run in maintaining its profit figures and meeting guidance. Maddoff did the same, for decades.

  2. This just ‘beating the earning estimates’, smacks of playing to the audience. Every analyst knows it, smells it, just that no body comments as this is a good thing they don’t want to stop. A true earnings management may be not fraudulent one, but a good earning management nevertheless.

  3. It is always on the corporate award list of all kinds just like Enron, Satyam, Tyco etc were. May be a mere coincidence. After all award winners don't turn out to be scamsters.

  4. The promoter commitment in Infosys companies are much less than other IT companies, not even trying to compare it with manufacturing companies here. Or are we to assume promoters are less interested?



The point of the above snapshot is- if a finger of doubt has to be raised, it can be raised at anyone. No exceptions. It is hard to satisfy everybody. If Infosys was such a dyed-in-wool moral blue-blood company, why has it not been able to attract Warren Buffet as its investor? When a small tea company or a retailer can charm him into investment! If I were to take that as an indicator, I would say, even Infosys does not meet many requirements, even the ones to stay on the moral high perch.



Disintegration



One of the things that have proven since 2000 is that companies, with long history and well-acclaimed, can fall and disintegrate in hours. Companies with decades of history, even a century, just melt in this world of mercurial finance. Similar thing happened to Satyam. Wiped out the instant the letter came in open. That does not indicate the weakness of Satyam, but just that there is no place for fraudsters in economy.



People and companies that preach knowledge economy must really understand where the true worth lies. There is no use pretending about that.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cognitive rules of business presentations

In his recent book, Clear and to the Point, Kosslyn explained that the four rules of PowerPoint are: The Goldilocks Rule, The Rudolph Rule, The Rule of Four, and the Birds of a Feather Rule. Here's how they work. The Goldilocks Rule refers to presenting the "just right" amount of data. Never include more information than your audience needs in a visual image. As an example, Kosslyn showed two graphs of real estate prices over time. One included ten different numbers, one for each year. The other included two numbers: a peak price, and the current price. For the purposes of a presentation about today's prices relative to peak price, those numbers were the only ones necessary. The Rudolph Rule refers to simple ways you can make information stand out and guide your audience to important details -- the way Rudolph the reindeer's red nose stood out from the other reindeers' and led them. If you're presenting a piece of relevant data in a list, why not mak...
Post a Comment
Read more

Value of dollar - Part 1

A Simple Perspective Will Do The date is 2000-05-28. Don't you get tired of all the bad news bears reminding you of all these instabilities, excesses, and 'potential' tensions in the global economy? After all, hasn't it always been like that? Yes it has, but not in money it hasn't. Increasingly, investors find it harder to know where to put their savings. What about Government Bonds? Wrong. Their recent record of capital losses have wiped out your guaranteed yields, probably because the stock market keeps crowding them out, and this even in a strong dollar and low inflation environment. Furthermore, there is no reliable liquidity and potentially poor quality debt in the corporate sector. Foreign assets? Wrong. Most of the world's economies are riskier, have been under performing, and also, there is this thing called currency risk. Like how is the average person gonna cope with currency...
Post a Comment
Read more

Depreciation of British Pound 1900-2000

When the Bank of England was formed the powers to create money was finally transferred to private hands. The creation of Fed in US, was just a part of this cycle. Though it is a common knowledge US Dollar has depreciated nearly 100% since the creation of Federal Reserve, the same is the case of all the currencies across the globe. For example, below is the UK Parliament data that highlights the depreciating value of Pound.
2 comments
Read more