Skip to main content

Where is the change, Mr. President?

Who can forget the days in mid-September 2008 when hundreds of billions became an household word. In a world where billions still live under-a-dollar a day, Senate went ahead to give largess of unbelievable $700 billion to greedy bankers.

In many ways, this bailout, that taking money from commoners pocket to feed the rich, was inevitable. Inevitable because there was no option to decline. It was accept or you accept. The fervent pleas of Paulson and his 'dire consequences' reverberated through the air.




Billions have flown out from people to bankers, administration has changed but not the 'if else, otherwise' attitudes of lawmakers. "If you don't give up few billions from your purse whole world will be afire." Use words like Armageddon or Catasrophe in the newspaper headlines and you will get billions sanctioned. Where is the change, Mr. President?


The fact is we are all dead, it is just that they are delaying the inevitable. There is no way the world's most debtor country can lead a recovery to sanity without having to go through a rough patch called recession. And recession is something everybody is avoiding like leprosy. May be too early to judge Obama but there seems to be no major change, yet.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How-to overcome sendentary lifestyle.

Some interesting points on overcoming sedentary lifestyle. There are many other routine ones, just try googling that. 1. Some not so routine tips on avoiding the sedentary lifestyle 2. Walking while talking on phone is a good way to get expressive and burn calories too. 3. Don't use the phone to call someone a short walking distance away. Walk and visit whenever possible. Same for grocery shopping. 4. Catch a different bus that makes you walk a bit more. You can catch a bus from a different stop, a little farther from your regular stop. 5. Pacing the length of the subway platform whenever the train/bus is late. 6. Dance Source: from various places on net

Net Neutrality - Fight for free expression

The "Net neutrality" issue, where we fear networks/infrastructure providers will decide (euphemism for censorship) what customers will read/watch/listen/buy on net. Many of the features that we fear in the "Net-neutrality" have already been implemented across various other platforms like telecom. For example, my telecom service provider has blocked the competitors GPRS sites and also does not allow access to many other sites on Internet, from where the free goodies like mobile applications, software, games, wallpapers, tones etc can be downloaded. This leaves me with the only service provider for above products, the service provider himself. This is totally blocking my freedom and my right to choose. This is just a glimpse; with "Net-neutrality" issues at stake are enormous. There should be no way; any entity (maybe, other than individual governments.) should be able to determine what is accessible and what is not. :) Falkor

Definition of Cult Stocks

From a blog: A classification describing stocks that have a sizable investor following, despite the fact that the underlying company has somewhat insignificant fundamentals. Typically, investors are initially attracted to the company's potential and accumulate positions in speculation that its potential will be fulfilled, providing the investors with a substantial payout. While most of these cult stocks promise they will be the next big story after they make a new discovery or get the newest contract from the government, most do not provide investors with anything other than the story. Furthermore, these stocks typically generate very little, if any, revenue at all. For example, many micro-cap biotech stocks are cult stocks. While they promise that they are going to be working on a miracle compound or drug, most of them do not have any source of income as they slowly burn away their initial capital in research and development. However, some cult stocks do occasionally make good on...