Skip to main content

Some facts and a tough question.


Now having established some ground rules, let’s face some dirty facts:


  1. Retail industry is one the most important sector in India with about 5% of population directly or indirectly linked to it.
  2. There is nothing the foreign MNC retailers can do to the present population of retailers and their stakeholders that Indian Mega retailers cannot do.
  3. India has little more than Three times the population for USA but the US per capita income is roughly 13 times more. Hence the retailers though they can serve more people and gauge more footfalls, won’t be able to sell or profit in equal measure – unless they are betting on surging per capita growth in next decades.
  4. The organized retail industry for all its wonderful growth (from a zero base) to present state has been a  magnificent failure. (How else do you explain the supposed inefficiencies in the sector? How else can the foreign retailers think there is more space to conquer here? Either the entire charade is to fleece the foreign retailers or the present mega retailers have grossly failed and under-performed)


Why does retail industry exist in India in its present situation?

Why does retail industry exist in India in its present situation? The answers much like Land Reforms is purely a social one. Retail industry has been the sponge which has soaked up much of the governmental inefficiency. The inefficiency in providing good primary education, in providing technical education, in failing to create industries / factories that create jobs, with government not doing enough to create a ecosystem of entrepreneurship and many more such failures.

In other words, the retail Industry in present state is a standing monument of Indian governments’ six decades of inefficiency – its failures in education, job creation goals and social welfare.

Retail industry is so large and yet so utterly fragments for a reason. Retail Industry is the low cost, low entry, low risk, and low qualification with better than subsistence profits. When the government which prides on the largest youth population goes on to create – jobs at next to nothing percentages.

Retail industry currently is one large pit of misallocated capital. More you study the reasons of its existence, more you will find these are “desperate capital” and (let’s say 60%) of this capital cannot be reallocated into different industries due to incapability of the patrons. (They have to be retired in a gradual evolutionary way and not to be thrown out with bath water.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How-to overcome sendentary lifestyle.

Some interesting points on overcoming sedentary lifestyle. There are many other routine ones, just try googling that. 1. Some not so routine tips on avoiding the sedentary lifestyle 2. Walking while talking on phone is a good way to get expressive and burn calories too. 3. Don't use the phone to call someone a short walking distance away. Walk and visit whenever possible. Same for grocery shopping. 4. Catch a different bus that makes you walk a bit more. You can catch a bus from a different stop, a little farther from your regular stop. 5. Pacing the length of the subway platform whenever the train/bus is late. 6. Dance Source: from various places on net

Net Neutrality - Fight for free expression

The "Net neutrality" issue, where we fear networks/infrastructure providers will decide (euphemism for censorship) what customers will read/watch/listen/buy on net. Many of the features that we fear in the "Net-neutrality" have already been implemented across various other platforms like telecom. For example, my telecom service provider has blocked the competitors GPRS sites and also does not allow access to many other sites on Internet, from where the free goodies like mobile applications, software, games, wallpapers, tones etc can be downloaded. This leaves me with the only service provider for above products, the service provider himself. This is totally blocking my freedom and my right to choose. This is just a glimpse; with "Net-neutrality" issues at stake are enormous. There should be no way; any entity (maybe, other than individual governments.) should be able to determine what is accessible and what is not. :) Falkor

Definition of Cult Stocks

From a blog: A classification describing stocks that have a sizable investor following, despite the fact that the underlying company has somewhat insignificant fundamentals. Typically, investors are initially attracted to the company's potential and accumulate positions in speculation that its potential will be fulfilled, providing the investors with a substantial payout. While most of these cult stocks promise they will be the next big story after they make a new discovery or get the newest contract from the government, most do not provide investors with anything other than the story. Furthermore, these stocks typically generate very little, if any, revenue at all. For example, many micro-cap biotech stocks are cult stocks. While they promise that they are going to be working on a miracle compound or drug, most of them do not have any source of income as they slowly burn away their initial capital in research and development. However, some cult stocks do occasionally make good on...