Skip to main content

Stranger Coincidences

Some people have argued this sudden reform-virtuousness is a red carpet welcome to Obama and his crew. Is there any truth in that? It would not be possible to full understand the back-room negotiations and give-takes but some co-incidences are biting.


It’s was just a strange coincidence that on the days heading to French elections early this year India offered Dassault Aviation a $10Billion fighter aircraft order. It was a stunning choice as Dassualt was not even considered a strong contender as it had not sold a substantial order till date. For all the baruhaha, Dassault’s Raffale is an unproven machine in combat and not a single machine had been sold outside of France. There was nothing going for it.

Dassault’s Raffale, an unproven combat machine, with not a single aircraft outside of France and an under-performer. The competitors cried foul alleging irregularities, as the competitive aircraft and options were far more worthy than Dassault. It seemed something else was in the mix. Looks like it was. The order coming at the time when then President Sakozy was struggling to project a growth image in French presidential elections, promptly thanked New Delhi for its support. The Dassault order had become India’s gift to Sarkozy for his Presidential campaign. 

India has again announced a very controversial, out-of-the-blue legislation. A legislation that most US retailing companies were keenly watching and hoping for. So, has Manmohan Singh and his government, offered India's retail industry on a platter to help Obama win his election bid? Was this a move to counter the outsourcing theme and put a carrot in front of US businesses to see the brighter side of US ‘s competitiveness? Or was it part of maneuver of US’s companies to produce in China and dump in India?

[It is frequently observed that governments do take measures so that influential countries have elected Head of States who are most sympathetic to their cause. The support is almost always given to the incumbent politicians / party, irrespective of their chances of winning. For example, France's support is crucial for India's carnal fixation of UN Sec seat.

An apt example in the current scenario is the "extreme" measures taken by ECB and Bank of Japan, to keep the risk sentiment high heading into Obama's elections. Greece and other bankrupt nations will be bailed out a zillion times if needed between now and the date of election. After the elections, you can be sure hot potatoes will dropped faster than a blink of an eye. Probably, Manmohan did his best to keep the sentiments high for the Emerging markets - at least enough to ensure it doesn't tank before the November elections.]

Continuing on the same thought: If this government still is in existence post November, and the FDI-Retail issue is still a burning hot potato, you can be certain lots of these provisions would be "rolled back" or put on a back burner. But, NOT until after the said elections.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cognitive rules of business presentations

In his recent book, Clear and to the Point, Kosslyn explained that the four rules of PowerPoint are: The Goldilocks Rule, The Rudolph Rule, The Rule of Four, and the Birds of a Feather Rule. Here's how they work. The Goldilocks Rule refers to presenting the "just right" amount of data. Never include more information than your audience needs in a visual image. As an example, Kosslyn showed two graphs of real estate prices over time. One included ten different numbers, one for each year. The other included two numbers: a peak price, and the current price. For the purposes of a presentation about today's prices relative to peak price, those numbers were the only ones necessary. The Rudolph Rule refers to simple ways you can make information stand out and guide your audience to important details -- the way Rudolph the reindeer's red nose stood out from the other reindeers' and led them. If you're presenting a piece of relevant data in a list, why not mak...
Post a Comment
Read more

Value of dollar - Part 1

A Simple Perspective Will Do The date is 2000-05-28. Don't you get tired of all the bad news bears reminding you of all these instabilities, excesses, and 'potential' tensions in the global economy? After all, hasn't it always been like that? Yes it has, but not in money it hasn't. Increasingly, investors find it harder to know where to put their savings. What about Government Bonds? Wrong. Their recent record of capital losses have wiped out your guaranteed yields, probably because the stock market keeps crowding them out, and this even in a strong dollar and low inflation environment. Furthermore, there is no reliable liquidity and potentially poor quality debt in the corporate sector. Foreign assets? Wrong. Most of the world's economies are riskier, have been under performing, and also, there is this thing called currency risk. Like how is the average person gonna cope with currency...
Post a Comment
Read more

Depreciation of British Pound 1900-2000

When the Bank of England was formed the powers to create money was finally transferred to private hands. The creation of Fed in US, was just a part of this cycle. Though it is a common knowledge US Dollar has depreciated nearly 100% since the creation of Federal Reserve, the same is the case of all the currencies across the globe. For example, below is the UK Parliament data that highlights the depreciating value of Pound.
2 comments
Read more