Skip to main content

Buying or Investing in fads


One of the first social battles I faced, and vividly remember, and if it can be battles that is, is the extraordinary preoccupation in owning and exhibiting your newest, sleekest and loudest music system by blaring it at such high volumes that you don’t have to hear your mother’s angry scream and also telegraph that such a boy is back from school. It was a fun time that we, a group of scientifically sharp but broke as rabbits, boys with sole other interest of playing cricket in hot sun.

Those were interesting times indeed. I don’t recall how we ended up fighting with friends, there were no rivals here, just the loudest music, but it was a one large experiment to enjoy. The guys with the off the shelf big brand music players won hands down and were always envied. However, the game was to ensure whose music was heard and not who had the most massive PMPO.

The reason I recall it is also because of the recent story I heard of a teacher telling students that if he had bought shares of Infosys instead of his Yamaha bike, today he would be able to buy a new Yamaha bike – every month. That’s very interesting, because we never know what will be the course of future. Lot of people did try to emulate his philosophy in late 90s and many won’t be left with enough money to buy a bicycle.

I guess, we humans can’t be blamed for fighting it out at the most primal level to mark our regions and ensure nobody tramples on our social authority. However, taking such an adventure too far beyond the chosen limits can only invite regret and even destruction. Dreaming of a good house, a better car, a better college etc are all valid wants that are right and justifiable for proper reasons. However, if these pursuits are accomplished only for the one-upmanship then this will sure turn down into regret.

Pursuing a fad, even if it is rationalized as an investment, will never stand the tests of time. That is because fads are never a trend, they are just a small space in time when they are prominent. Therefore somebody splurging on the latest gadgets bought just for the heck of it, and to be the alpha for few days or months before the gadget is “middle class’d” is missing his “Infosys.” Such an investment is purely personal choice but it will be sad if other people chase that person in needless pursuit.

It doesn’t matter what the product is, or what its cost, the decision to buy or not ultimately has to be based on the utility of the product and the returns on it – social or financial. It would be a house, a car, an Iphone5 or something else.

Point of the rant simply is this: Chasing a fad*, buying it and calling it an investment is fooling nobody but yourself.

BTW, the scientific acumen that we young boys displayed was enormously successful. What we accomplished with some ingenuity and household items, even the Phillips and Panasonics could not do. Almost everyday of those days, neighbors heard us. Boys who spent ‘million’ on those fancy players lost out most. J

*What is fad? Go figure.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How-to overcome sendentary lifestyle.

Some interesting points on overcoming sedentary lifestyle. There are many other routine ones, just try googling that. 1. Some not so routine tips on avoiding the sedentary lifestyle 2. Walking while talking on phone is a good way to get expressive and burn calories too. 3. Don't use the phone to call someone a short walking distance away. Walk and visit whenever possible. Same for grocery shopping. 4. Catch a different bus that makes you walk a bit more. You can catch a bus from a different stop, a little farther from your regular stop. 5. Pacing the length of the subway platform whenever the train/bus is late. 6. Dance Source: from various places on net

Cognitive rules of business presentations

In his recent book, Clear and to the Point, Kosslyn explained that the four rules of PowerPoint are: The Goldilocks Rule, The Rudolph Rule, The Rule of Four, and the Birds of a Feather Rule. Here's how they work. The Goldilocks Rule refers to presenting the "just right" amount of data. Never include more information than your audience needs in a visual image. As an example, Kosslyn showed two graphs of real estate prices over time. One included ten different numbers, one for each year. The other included two numbers: a peak price, and the current price. For the purposes of a presentation about today's prices relative to peak price, those numbers were the only ones necessary. The Rudolph Rule refers to simple ways you can make information stand out and guide your audience to important details -- the way Rudolph the reindeer's red nose stood out from the other reindeers' and led them. If you're presenting a piece of relevant data in a list, why not mak...

Definition of Cult Stocks

From a blog: A classification describing stocks that have a sizable investor following, despite the fact that the underlying company has somewhat insignificant fundamentals. Typically, investors are initially attracted to the company's potential and accumulate positions in speculation that its potential will be fulfilled, providing the investors with a substantial payout. While most of these cult stocks promise they will be the next big story after they make a new discovery or get the newest contract from the government, most do not provide investors with anything other than the story. Furthermore, these stocks typically generate very little, if any, revenue at all. For example, many micro-cap biotech stocks are cult stocks. While they promise that they are going to be working on a miracle compound or drug, most of them do not have any source of income as they slowly burn away their initial capital in research and development. However, some cult stocks do occasionally make good on...