Skip to main content

Ranting FDI


Today's rather agitated discussions on FDI in retail is perfect example of how completely divorced people can be to practical realities.

FDI in retail, the opposition of which has distinct socialistic connotations and support of which has shades of crony capitalism. No body will say that the tide of FDI and opening of economy can be reversed or stopped at the Retail's gate. However, what is surprising are the arguments put forth, majority of which tends to be on either end of the spectrum. 

The simple answer is, both the ends are wrong. There has to be a middle ground. [We would have been happy not to have this mess for now had not been the hurried miscarriage by Manmohan's government]

The practical solution is to find a workable solution, IF that is possible. [Parties so close to elections would not give a damn about practicalities.] Yes, if the elections in Gujarat had been over by now, their tone would have been distinctly lower, more conciliatory and less obstructionist.

Whatever the charade, we know ultimately it is the money that is going to win the game. The suicidal farmer can't pay lakhs of rupees for TV ad slots. They don't matter nor does their poverty, suffering or any other human failings, unless of course, when needed for some selfish purpose. Every city needs a museum, a country too needs few poor people to show the developments it is making.

It doesn't matter where you are on the spectrum of agreement, what matters is that you are likely to loose. If you are On for crony capitalism, please note that you are going to loose in future. If you are On for socialistic protectionism, please note that you will continue to loose, until your capitalistic-supporting brethren take your place. Hey, its a give and take world. Don't blame my stupid, (almost drunk) rant for the mess that your 'Greatest Economist Prime Minister" is subjecting you guys too. I hope you will enjoy boiling in the oil, as much as I would enjoy exploiting it.

Come on guys, why are you batting for the under dogs. Who in this case are decidedly the poor burden on society called farmers. People say even farmers will be better off once the FDI goes through, all I would ask them is that: under what conditions do farmers prosper and what is going to be their sacrifices to get that prosperity? 

Be sure of one thing, it doesn't give a damn as to who the Prime Minister or the future Prime Minister is or the lady in the treasury bench or opposition bench is... what matters, and the only thing that matters is that rich people who control the people and influencers will always have their way.

Another interesting factor to think, nah... rumor about, or whatever it should be called is: why is this farmer takeover provisions (ooops, I said it again) comes when the world comes into the realization that the best investment for next one-two decades is --- the farm land!! Big hugs to you, if you guess it right! Love you. 

Now, why the hell are people selling out our country with no provisions of safety or society of Indians. Incredible apathy. 

Hey, I digress into the socialistic path.. back up.

The way these processes are implemented are so wrong that it stinks. Stinks really bad. Could this have been handled better by Congress / UPA in such a way that it was presented as beneficial and actually help it work for the party's election prospects. Yes, it is very much conceivable. However, the rumps in the Congress seem to have been in hurry for 'God Only Knows' reasons. Anyway they will bear the burden.

Ok... gotta go, time for dinner. C ya.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cognitive rules of business presentations

In his recent book, Clear and to the Point, Kosslyn explained that the four rules of PowerPoint are: The Goldilocks Rule, The Rudolph Rule, The Rule of Four, and the Birds of a Feather Rule. Here's how they work. The Goldilocks Rule refers to presenting the "just right" amount of data. Never include more information than your audience needs in a visual image. As an example, Kosslyn showed two graphs of real estate prices over time. One included ten different numbers, one for each year. The other included two numbers: a peak price, and the current price. For the purposes of a presentation about today's prices relative to peak price, those numbers were the only ones necessary. The Rudolph Rule refers to simple ways you can make information stand out and guide your audience to important details -- the way Rudolph the reindeer's red nose stood out from the other reindeers' and led them. If you're presenting a piece of relevant data in a list, why not mak...

Value of dollar - Part 1

A Simple Perspective Will Do The date is 2000-05-28. Don't you get tired of all the bad news bears reminding you of all these instabilities, excesses, and 'potential' tensions in the global economy? After all, hasn't it always been like that? Yes it has, but not in money it hasn't. Increasingly, investors find it harder to know where to put their savings. What about Government Bonds? Wrong. Their recent record of capital losses have wiped out your guaranteed yields, probably because the stock market keeps crowding them out, and this even in a strong dollar and low inflation environment. Furthermore, there is no reliable liquidity and potentially poor quality debt in the corporate sector. Foreign assets? Wrong. Most of the world's economies are riskier, have been under performing, and also, there is this thing called currency risk. Like how is the average person gonna cope with currency...

Depreciation of British Pound 1900-2000

When the Bank of England was formed the powers to create money was finally transferred to private hands. The creation of Fed in US, was just a part of this cycle. Though it is a common knowledge US Dollar has depreciated nearly 100% since the creation of Federal Reserve, the same is the case of all the currencies across the globe. For example, below is the UK Parliament data that highlights the depreciating value of Pound.