Skip to main content

AAP without Anna is a failure [Elections]

In December when Aam Admi Party swept the Delhi's polls, it was a tectonic shift. A new party, made of political rookies sweeping deeply entrenched parties was a credible job.

What was the reason a new party was so successful? This subject has been beaten to death post that win, however there is one aspect which I have not seen people have tackled much. That's possible because most of the news channels seem to concentrate on the present and few are rarely concerned about history. 

Well, for the history. AAP has its origins in the Anna Hazare's movement against corruption. The timing of the corruption and its subsequent ability to grip the masses' imagination was spectacular. The key is - this was in 2011-12. 

In effect, Aam Admi Party has been campaigning against the establishment - Congress and BJP, since at least 3 years. With the movement led by Anna Hazare and supported by almost all sections of society across the country, and also supported by celebrities, led to successful tabling of the Lokpal Bill which Anna was keen on. The formation of Aam Admi Party was in effect a continuation of these activities by civil society against the established parties and hence has much more credibility on the ground. Turning these 3 years of movement, and tapping on to the seam of frustrations it was easy for Aam Admi Party to win these elections in the way it did.

The vote share percentage, even after all these direct contact and mass meetings under Anna Hazare and subsequent campaigning, it could only garner a third of votes, which is highly credible for a small new party, but not good enough to be taken seriously.

The biggest mistake of AAP is to extrapolate its support and success in Delhi, on to the national stage without taking into account the groundswell support created by Anna's movement and the long time of stealth campaign, is going to be disastrous for its ex-Delhi election battles.

This is the key factor that will greatly affect AAP and its credibility. The scramble with which AAP is trying to go national, despite ditching a great opportunity to establish a track record in Delhi was a big mistake. The proof of this will come in the Delhi's assembly elections. Any slipping of AAP's vote share and seats will be direct proof of how badly they stumbled in their strategy.

For a change, they should have listened to veteran politicians who preached a restraint in policy making, instead of dashing to finish line. Had they had patience to look at 2019 and playing for it, like Rahul Gandhi and whole echelons of Congress leaders, AAP would have had substantial chance to make a difference. With the current strategy they are going to fatigue double-quick and will loose all the activist credibility with the losses they are bound to face across India. Delhi however will be the final test, and if it comes to it, the final straw. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cognitive rules of business presentations

In his recent book, Clear and to the Point, Kosslyn explained that the four rules of PowerPoint are: The Goldilocks Rule, The Rudolph Rule, The Rule of Four, and the Birds of a Feather Rule. Here's how they work. The Goldilocks Rule refers to presenting the "just right" amount of data. Never include more information than your audience needs in a visual image. As an example, Kosslyn showed two graphs of real estate prices over time. One included ten different numbers, one for each year. The other included two numbers: a peak price, and the current price. For the purposes of a presentation about today's prices relative to peak price, those numbers were the only ones necessary. The Rudolph Rule refers to simple ways you can make information stand out and guide your audience to important details -- the way Rudolph the reindeer's red nose stood out from the other reindeers' and led them. If you're presenting a piece of relevant data in a list, why not mak...
Post a Comment
Read more

Value of dollar - Part 1

A Simple Perspective Will Do The date is 2000-05-28. Don't you get tired of all the bad news bears reminding you of all these instabilities, excesses, and 'potential' tensions in the global economy? After all, hasn't it always been like that? Yes it has, but not in money it hasn't. Increasingly, investors find it harder to know where to put their savings. What about Government Bonds? Wrong. Their recent record of capital losses have wiped out your guaranteed yields, probably because the stock market keeps crowding them out, and this even in a strong dollar and low inflation environment. Furthermore, there is no reliable liquidity and potentially poor quality debt in the corporate sector. Foreign assets? Wrong. Most of the world's economies are riskier, have been under performing, and also, there is this thing called currency risk. Like how is the average person gonna cope with currency...
Post a Comment
Read more

Depreciation of British Pound 1900-2000

When the Bank of England was formed the powers to create money was finally transferred to private hands. The creation of Fed in US, was just a part of this cycle. Though it is a common knowledge US Dollar has depreciated nearly 100% since the creation of Federal Reserve, the same is the case of all the currencies across the globe. For example, below is the UK Parliament data that highlights the depreciating value of Pound.
2 comments
Read more