Skip to main content

AAP without Anna is a failure [Elections]

In December when Aam Admi Party swept the Delhi's polls, it was a tectonic shift. A new party, made of political rookies sweeping deeply entrenched parties was a credible job.

What was the reason a new party was so successful? This subject has been beaten to death post that win, however there is one aspect which I have not seen people have tackled much. That's possible because most of the news channels seem to concentrate on the present and few are rarely concerned about history. 

Well, for the history. AAP has its origins in the Anna Hazare's movement against corruption. The timing of the corruption and its subsequent ability to grip the masses' imagination was spectacular. The key is - this was in 2011-12. 

In effect, Aam Admi Party has been campaigning against the establishment - Congress and BJP, since at least 3 years. With the movement led by Anna Hazare and supported by almost all sections of society across the country, and also supported by celebrities, led to successful tabling of the Lokpal Bill which Anna was keen on. The formation of Aam Admi Party was in effect a continuation of these activities by civil society against the established parties and hence has much more credibility on the ground. Turning these 3 years of movement, and tapping on to the seam of frustrations it was easy for Aam Admi Party to win these elections in the way it did.

The vote share percentage, even after all these direct contact and mass meetings under Anna Hazare and subsequent campaigning, it could only garner a third of votes, which is highly credible for a small new party, but not good enough to be taken seriously.

The biggest mistake of AAP is to extrapolate its support and success in Delhi, on to the national stage without taking into account the groundswell support created by Anna's movement and the long time of stealth campaign, is going to be disastrous for its ex-Delhi election battles.

This is the key factor that will greatly affect AAP and its credibility. The scramble with which AAP is trying to go national, despite ditching a great opportunity to establish a track record in Delhi was a big mistake. The proof of this will come in the Delhi's assembly elections. Any slipping of AAP's vote share and seats will be direct proof of how badly they stumbled in their strategy.

For a change, they should have listened to veteran politicians who preached a restraint in policy making, instead of dashing to finish line. Had they had patience to look at 2019 and playing for it, like Rahul Gandhi and whole echelons of Congress leaders, AAP would have had substantial chance to make a difference. With the current strategy they are going to fatigue double-quick and will loose all the activist credibility with the losses they are bound to face across India. Delhi however will be the final test, and if it comes to it, the final straw. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How-to overcome sendentary lifestyle.

Some interesting points on overcoming sedentary lifestyle. There are many other routine ones, just try googling that. 1. Some not so routine tips on avoiding the sedentary lifestyle 2. Walking while talking on phone is a good way to get expressive and burn calories too. 3. Don't use the phone to call someone a short walking distance away. Walk and visit whenever possible. Same for grocery shopping. 4. Catch a different bus that makes you walk a bit more. You can catch a bus from a different stop, a little farther from your regular stop. 5. Pacing the length of the subway platform whenever the train/bus is late. 6. Dance Source: from various places on net
Post a Comment
Read more

Cognitive rules of business presentations

In his recent book, Clear and to the Point, Kosslyn explained that the four rules of PowerPoint are: The Goldilocks Rule, The Rudolph Rule, The Rule of Four, and the Birds of a Feather Rule. Here's how they work. The Goldilocks Rule refers to presenting the "just right" amount of data. Never include more information than your audience needs in a visual image. As an example, Kosslyn showed two graphs of real estate prices over time. One included ten different numbers, one for each year. The other included two numbers: a peak price, and the current price. For the purposes of a presentation about today's prices relative to peak price, those numbers were the only ones necessary. The Rudolph Rule refers to simple ways you can make information stand out and guide your audience to important details -- the way Rudolph the reindeer's red nose stood out from the other reindeers' and led them. If you're presenting a piece of relevant data in a list, why not mak...
Post a Comment
Read more

Definition of Cult Stocks

From a blog: A classification describing stocks that have a sizable investor following, despite the fact that the underlying company has somewhat insignificant fundamentals. Typically, investors are initially attracted to the company's potential and accumulate positions in speculation that its potential will be fulfilled, providing the investors with a substantial payout. While most of these cult stocks promise they will be the next big story after they make a new discovery or get the newest contract from the government, most do not provide investors with anything other than the story. Furthermore, these stocks typically generate very little, if any, revenue at all. For example, many micro-cap biotech stocks are cult stocks. While they promise that they are going to be working on a miracle compound or drug, most of them do not have any source of income as they slowly burn away their initial capital in research and development. However, some cult stocks do occasionally make good on...
Post a Comment
Read more