Skip to main content

Notes on Divination systems

Divination Systems

What has been will be again,

What has been done will be done again;

There is nothing new under the sun.

- Ecclesiastes 1:9

Man has always been eager to stretch beyond the imagination. One thing even after millennia we cannot do consistently is travel ahead of time. Time doesn’t move faster or slower. Time doesn’t allow itself to be manipulated nor does it allow us to know what future would be if things happen the way they are happening. Time does not allow us to modify future by letting us have peek at it. But that thing beyond the horizon, the search for the world's end, is what broadens the horizon.

And out of this quest are born divination systems. The veracity and its effectiveness of each system are unknowns. Possibly dependent on the player and not the system itself.

Future is highly malleable and elastic. We can manipulate it at our will. But if you bring in God and destiny into context, the picture may start to resemble Quantum and Chaos principles.

Statistical outcomes

All these divination systems are statistical. The submissions of palmistry, for instance, are derived from studying palms of thousands of persons of varying traits. Features, the presence or absence of it, were used to signify the presence or absence of particular trait.

In many senses, no divination system can be ever complete. On the other hand, divination systems do not need much time to complete themselves. There is so much history, that all systems should be perfect by now. Hence, I just assume that players are at fault than the system itself.

Some systems however are more scientific, in a sense its forecasts and outcomes are tabulated for analysis. The systems like meteorology, climate, technical analysis of markets; market share data analytics etc are well researched. Needless to say these systems are much more objective and reliable than entirely subjective. Simultaneously, it does not imply subjective ideas are less effective only that the outcomes are more anecdotal. For example, it unlikely any study has been conducted on the accuracy of reading tea-leaves or tarots.

Every system was made for some particular purpose. This is because of definite rationale that has gone into making of that system. So every system specializes in answering something and may not be suited for other purposes. All these systems are made with an objective of answering different questions or more precisely different modes of questioning to arrive at a same answer.

Chaotic universe

Chaos theory describes behavior of nonlinear and dynamical systems that are highly sensitive to initial conditions and any events occurring during the action of system. In effect, a slight change in initial conditions and events during the procedure will increase the possibilities exponentially. An interesting quantum theory states there are infinite universes (quantum multiverse), playing out its’ own version of 'events'. If these are true, we do not have any hope in peeking into future because of infinite variables. It is in this context, Ecclesiastes’ sayings hold us in good stead. By allowing no new possibilities other than one that has already happened (what happened once is past might have been new at that time) we substantially reduce the number of probabilities.

Seeing Future – is it a possibility?

The basic principle on which the tarots are based is: We, in the present moment, are part of the time that also contains future (in it) by looking at what is happening to us (and around us) presently we can estimate what the future is likely to be.

In other words, we are already part of future or future is already part of us. This fits the quantum theory and may be other theories too.

Conclusion

Prediction is futile if it compromises our present. If there is anything that we can change then we must change that (like skill-sets, for example), if necessary. If there are things that affects us but we cant change (like presidential elections) we must watch them and form opinions as we go along.

Trying to reach for the holy grail of divination systems is killing the present moment - literally. There is nothing more futile than fritter away the present moment and its opportunities in chasing a goal that does not exist.

Somebody said that I look at future better because I use the rear view mirror to look at it. This is the central theme of all divination systems. But that is no reason to take our eyes off the road or drive in reverse!

What is twisted cannot be straightened;
what is lacking cannot be counted.

- Ecclesiastes 1:15

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cognitive rules of business presentations

In his recent book, Clear and to the Point, Kosslyn explained that the four rules of PowerPoint are: The Goldilocks Rule, The Rudolph Rule, The Rule of Four, and the Birds of a Feather Rule. Here's how they work. The Goldilocks Rule refers to presenting the "just right" amount of data. Never include more information than your audience needs in a visual image. As an example, Kosslyn showed two graphs of real estate prices over time. One included ten different numbers, one for each year. The other included two numbers: a peak price, and the current price. For the purposes of a presentation about today's prices relative to peak price, those numbers were the only ones necessary. The Rudolph Rule refers to simple ways you can make information stand out and guide your audience to important details -- the way Rudolph the reindeer's red nose stood out from the other reindeers' and led them. If you're presenting a piece of relevant data in a list, why not mak...
Post a Comment
Read more

Value of dollar - Part 1

A Simple Perspective Will Do The date is 2000-05-28. Don't you get tired of all the bad news bears reminding you of all these instabilities, excesses, and 'potential' tensions in the global economy? After all, hasn't it always been like that? Yes it has, but not in money it hasn't. Increasingly, investors find it harder to know where to put their savings. What about Government Bonds? Wrong. Their recent record of capital losses have wiped out your guaranteed yields, probably because the stock market keeps crowding them out, and this even in a strong dollar and low inflation environment. Furthermore, there is no reliable liquidity and potentially poor quality debt in the corporate sector. Foreign assets? Wrong. Most of the world's economies are riskier, have been under performing, and also, there is this thing called currency risk. Like how is the average person gonna cope with currency...
Post a Comment
Read more

Depreciation of British Pound 1900-2000

When the Bank of England was formed the powers to create money was finally transferred to private hands. The creation of Fed in US, was just a part of this cycle. Though it is a common knowledge US Dollar has depreciated nearly 100% since the creation of Federal Reserve, the same is the case of all the currencies across the globe. For example, below is the UK Parliament data that highlights the depreciating value of Pound.
2 comments
Read more