Skip to main content

A New Democracy where 99% don't matter


Elections are terrible creatures. 

Elections push and pull, some legit and many illegitimately.  It’s usually the strongest power which wins, It doesn't matter what the manifesto or rally-talk is.

Elections make rulers and the citizens the ruled ones. It is not citizens choosing a representative anymore as to having to choose who will rule them. Citizens decide who will crack the whip for next 4-5 years and whom are they going to obey.

Democracy is a hollow concept. What makes democracy whole is the ethics and sense of public duty. When the politicians we choose to govern are uninterested in these values, the democracy descends into farce. Each is better on their own than having to live under the weight of combined wisdom.

Elections are terrible for it shifts and polarize the opinions. And election years are more terrible than you can imagine. The whole series of manipulation, the conceptual hara-kiri, the freebies and threats, the success postures and the hidden whips all form to make it a terrible year for the establishment. 

This rant is because of the couple of articles and opinions floating around - genuine or fake, is not my concern - that (may) have ability to influence how we see the democracy in decades to come. They are just blatant opportunism scaffold in the veneer of public good.

Below are some links that you may want to read - importantly, with a critical mind. Don’t believe anything you read, don't disagree with anything you read just for the heck of it. Read them in the order if possible and see if constant characters crop up. Stand back and look at the broad strokes that are in formation among these series of articles.

Just remember what makes election years terrible is the steady stream of lies, disinformation and deception.

Will Obama Keep Power 'by Any Means Necessary?

Too Much of a Good Thing - Why we need less democracy.

The New Normal's New Populism

Also:

Do Obama's Executive Orders Reveal A Pattern?

Who Does The Government Intend To Shoot?


If anything Democracy has become it is this: The false rule of majority and Tyranny of Minority.

The first shots in undermining the majority voted electoral systems have been fired. Probably this time in some seriousness. In effect the 99% won’t matter.

We leave you with some snippets from the above articles:

"This is why I believe that we need to jettison the Civics 101 fairy tale about pure representative democracy and instead begin to build a new set of rules and institutions that would make legislative inertia less detrimental to our nation’s long-term health."

"A significant part of the response to polarization and gridlock must involve creating more independent institutions." (Link)


"Over 165 million people, a clear majority of the 308 million Americans counted by the U.S. Census Bureau in 2010, are at least partially dependents of the state."

"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising them the most benefits from the public treasury."

Watch this space...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How-to overcome sendentary lifestyle.

Some interesting points on overcoming sedentary lifestyle. There are many other routine ones, just try googling that. 1. Some not so routine tips on avoiding the sedentary lifestyle 2. Walking while talking on phone is a good way to get expressive and burn calories too. 3. Don't use the phone to call someone a short walking distance away. Walk and visit whenever possible. Same for grocery shopping. 4. Catch a different bus that makes you walk a bit more. You can catch a bus from a different stop, a little farther from your regular stop. 5. Pacing the length of the subway platform whenever the train/bus is late. 6. Dance Source: from various places on net

Net Neutrality - Fight for free expression

The "Net neutrality" issue, where we fear networks/infrastructure providers will decide (euphemism for censorship) what customers will read/watch/listen/buy on net. Many of the features that we fear in the "Net-neutrality" have already been implemented across various other platforms like telecom. For example, my telecom service provider has blocked the competitors GPRS sites and also does not allow access to many other sites on Internet, from where the free goodies like mobile applications, software, games, wallpapers, tones etc can be downloaded. This leaves me with the only service provider for above products, the service provider himself. This is totally blocking my freedom and my right to choose. This is just a glimpse; with "Net-neutrality" issues at stake are enormous. There should be no way; any entity (maybe, other than individual governments.) should be able to determine what is accessible and what is not. :) Falkor

Definition of Cult Stocks

From a blog: A classification describing stocks that have a sizable investor following, despite the fact that the underlying company has somewhat insignificant fundamentals. Typically, investors are initially attracted to the company's potential and accumulate positions in speculation that its potential will be fulfilled, providing the investors with a substantial payout. While most of these cult stocks promise they will be the next big story after they make a new discovery or get the newest contract from the government, most do not provide investors with anything other than the story. Furthermore, these stocks typically generate very little, if any, revenue at all. For example, many micro-cap biotech stocks are cult stocks. While they promise that they are going to be working on a miracle compound or drug, most of them do not have any source of income as they slowly burn away their initial capital in research and development. However, some cult stocks do occasionally make good on...